|
Contact
+ Contact Form
Search
+ Search Form
Introduction
+ Aims & Scope
+ Structure
+ History
Announcements
+ Updates
+ Calls for Papers
+ New Lectures
+ New Publications
Alphabetical Index
+ Author Index
+ Speaker Index
Chronological Index
+ Ancient History
+ Medieval History
+ Modern History
Geographical Index
+ African History
+ American History
+ Asian History
+ European History
+ Oceanian History
Topical Index
+ Prosecution
+ Cases
+ Types
+ Offenders
+ Victims
+ Society
+ Research
+ Representations
Resources
+ Institutions
+ Literature Search
+ Research
|
Start:
Alphabetical Index:
Author Index:
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
F |
G |
H |
I |
J |
K |
L |
M |
N |
O |
P |
Q |
R |
S |
T |
U |
V |
W |
X |
Y |
Z |
Unknown
First published: March 1, 2026 - Last updated: March 1, 2026
TITLE INFORMATION
Author: Miyuki J.H. Kerkhof
Title: Democratising harm?
Subtitle: Sexual violence, wellbeing and the digital collection of the Rijksmuseum
Journal: International Journal of Heritage Studies
Volume: (Published online before print)
Issue:
Year: 2026 (Received: September 21, 2025, Accepted: January 15, 2026, Published online: January 28, 2026)
Pages: 24 pages (PDF)
pISSN: 1352-7258 -
Find a Library: WorldCat |
eISSN: 1470-3610 -
Find a Library: WorldCat
Language: English
Keywords:
Modern History:
21st Century |
European History:
Dutch History |
Society:
Museums /
Rijksmuseum
FULL TEXT
Link:
Taylor & Francis Online (Free Access)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Authors:
-
Miyuki J. H. Kerkhof,
Faculteit Archeologie (Faculty of Archaeology),
Universiteit Leiden (Leiden University) -
ORCID,
ResearchGate
Abstract:
»Engagement with cultural heritage is often presented as beneficial for mental and physical wellbeing, and museums increasingly promote themselves as inclusive institutions. Yet digital heritage practices can unintentionally perpetuate inequalities and reproduce harm when sensitive subjects such as sexual violence are euphemised or recontextualised without care. This paper examines how the Dutch Rijksmuseum’s digital collection mediates sexual violence through its cataloguing language, multilingual search functions and visitor-generated content. Quantitative mapping of search results in Dutch and English was combined with qualitative interpretation of metadata descriptions, institutional tags and interface pathways to analyse how depictions of sexual violence become visible or obscured. The results reveal systematic patterns, including euphemistic and sanitising language, inconsistent terminology across languages and unmoderated visitor features that can expose users to triggering content. These patterns demonstrate how well-intentioned efforts to democratise digital heritage risk undermining inclusivity. This article proposes feminist ethics of care and trauma-informed approaches to digital heritage practices, prioritising non-euphemistic metadata, critical contextualisation of patriarchal structures, content warnings and points of pause, and community-based moderation of visitor features. Centring survivor wellbeing reframes digital heritage not as a neutral repository but as a care infrastructure, positioning museums as accountable to users and survivor communities.«
(Source: International Journal of Heritage Studies)
Contents:
| |
Abstract (p. 1) |
| |
Introduction (p. 1) |
| |
Case study: the Rijksmuseum digital collection (p. 3) |
| |
Theoretical-methodological framework (p. 4) |
| |
|
Data collection and sampling (p. 5) |
| |
|
Limitations (p. 6) |
| |
Findings: patterns of representation in the Rijksmuseum’s digital collection (p. 7) |
| |
|
Search outcomes and metadata categories (p. 7) |
| |
|
|
‘Heroic’ rape and euphemisation (p. 9) |
| |
|
|
Selective recognition in metadata (p. 10) |
| |
|
Visual motifs of sexual violence (p. 13) |
| |
|
Unintentional exposure through navigational drift (p. 14) |
| |
Discussion (p. 16) |
| |
|
Humanising language through community consultation (p. 18) |
| |
|
Critical contextualisation of patriarchal structures (p. 18) |
| |
|
Interstices as solidarity (p. 18) |
| |
|
Disrupting algorithmic amplification of harm (p. 20) |
| |
Conclusion (p. 20) |
| |
Note (p. 21) |
| |
Disclosure statement (p. 21) |
| |
Notes on contributor (p. 21) |
| |
References (p. 21) |
Wikipedia:
History of Europe:
History of the Netherlands |
Museum:
Museums in the Netherlands /
Rijksmuseum |
Sex and the law:
Sexual violence
|